Awareness-Hub

Research and commentary at the intersection of psychology, technology, and ethics. Exploring what it means to stay human in an age of intelligent machines.

What is Stability Capitalism?

What is Stability Capitalism?

When Machines Take Jobs. Machines Pay The Rent.

Click link for the FULL Paper (GitHub)

Or view substack for more info https://stabilitycapitalism.substack.com

What You Get

  • $3,000 per month, tax-free
  • Direct-deposited into your checking account
  • Every month
  • Ages 18–66, if you make less or equal to $75,000
  • Phases out gradually to $0 at $110,000
  • Seniors keep all Social Security
  • Seniors below $3,000/month get topped up

How It Works (In Plain English)

  • Big companies use AI millions of times a day
  • Each AI “task” costs them almost nothing
  • We add a tiny fee: 0.054 cents per AI task
  • That’s $0.00054
  • Less than 1/20th of a penny
  • Companies never notice it. Because AI is used trillions of times a year..
    • It adds up to $1.6 T in revenue
    • Enough to fund every eligible American’s $3,000

Who Pays?

  • NOT you
  • NOT workers
  • NOT Small businesses
  • NOT your taxes
  • NOT the federal budger

Only big tech + big corporations :

  • Amazon AWS
  • Microsoft Azure
  • Google Cloud
  • NVIDIA
  • Anthropic
  • Open AI
  • xAI

Why This Matters

  • AI is already replacing jobs
  • Layoffs are accelerating
  • People need stability during the transition
  • Rent, food, and life keep getting more expensive
  • What You Can Do With It
  • Pay rent
  • Cover bills
  • Buy groceries
  • Save for emergencies
  • Go back to school
  • Start a small business
  • Take care of kids or aging parents
  • Get out of debt
  • Move to safer housing

What It’s NOT

  • Not socialism
  • Not welfare
  • Not a handout
  • Not taken from your paycheck
  • Not a tax increase
  • Not replacing work

Why It’s Guaranteed to Work

  • Alaska has done something similar for 40 years
  • UBI trials show people still work
  • Inflation stays low when housing is protected
  • Cloud tech already supports this type of billing
  • The U.S. has full legal authority to enforce it
  • This is simple, modern, and fair.

Bottom Line

$3,000/month for every working-age American.

 No new taxes, No debt, No BS.  Just a tiny slice of AI profits funding human stability.

NOTE: This is a Policy Paper, it is not actual fact, it has not been passed into Law. If you see the value in it please reach out to your representative.

Posted in , ,

4 responses to “What is Stability Capitalism?”

  1. David Fleischman Avatar
    David Fleischman

    Corporations will just continue to pass down their costs to customers. For this model, I assume that would be in software product costs and subscription fees. Regardless, it sounds like a fair and effective way to reimburse everyone for the value of their data, already being collected in so many ways.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    1. rae43017 Avatar
      rae43017

      David. This is collected at the cloud compute level, AWS, Azure, etc. yes they could increase costs but there is no need to. There are already trillions of inferences a day and we are simply asking them to collect .054 cents, a fat nickel, per $100 of COMMERCIAL inferences. They already perform tracking for carbon and their own billing, we are asking for another transaction in the log. Currently the gross profit for these companies are up to 72%, operating profit is 30-40%, this would make a very small dent in their overall profit.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
  2. Brian Schaefer Avatar
    Brian Schaefer

    So what you suggest, if I’m understanding correctly, is to take a little less than half of the US GDP growth rate annually and redirect it to the pockets of the working age Americans regardless of the productivity of the individual. It does not appear to make any stipulation for the care of funds for under competent individuals or wealth management in transit. It also doesn’t seem to make any allowance for having slowed the growth of the economy and the negative impact to the overall population or growth of the dollar is an international currency as a result. Several countries have already been making motion to stabilize themselves against an underperforming US dollar. Is there a second stage of policy to account for the potential recession?

    Like

    Reply
    1. rae43017 Avatar
      rae43017

      Hi Brian,
      I guess it wasn’t clear because US GDP does not come from ai dividends or cloud compute solely. What was not clear in version 1.1 and I hope is clearer in version 2.0 is that currently we have large concentration of income coming into robotics and cloud compute (eg AI) this was money that previously would have went to wages, but now goes into the ledgers of the likes of Microsoft, Google, AWS, openai, xai. These companies have gross profits of up to 72percent. The framework suggests we capture $0.0009 per inference transaction. We initially roll out assistance for those making less than $50k per year and bank the difference to allow a sovereign fund to build up. By year 4 we can help all working Americans to lift them up and stabilize them. Full details are in the 65 page document on git hub: https://github.com/macaisling/stability-capitalism

      but the condensed version can be read on substack: https://open.substack.com/pub/raeosun/p/condensed-brief?r=vpsfn&utm_medium=ios

      To answer your question about the “under competent” … While I have considered those that cannot fend for themselves, orphans, ssd recipients, etc. I have not included the finer details in the framework as it is just that, a framework. If the upcoming recession mirrors previous recessions and this framework is in place people will have a $36k per year cushion to fall back on, there are currently at least a million people who are long term unemployed that would benefit greatly. Our current support system doesn’t help people the way it should, if is convoluted and has steep edged cliffs that keep people in poverty.

      Like

      Reply

Leave a reply to rae43017 Cancel reply